You are viewing [info]behoovingmoving's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Two thumbs down for The Copenhagen Wheel

As a gentleman and a scholar, I am duty bound on occasion to expose some real racket, especially when it brings into disrepute the institution of academia, in which god himself should be able to trust. The Copenhagen Wheel is touted as a revolution for cities, and soon to be in production. It is the product of MIT's SENSEable City Lab, a group I can't quite figure out to be honest. If this is a bunch of students just having fun, then rock and roll baby. All credit to them. But they do come across as some kind of MIT sanctioned think tank, slash research centre, slash commercialiser of research.

The Copenhagen Wheel is an electronic assist hub, activated by torque sensors—nothing new there—on top of which SENSEable City Lab have thrown everything they could think of. It is controlled by riders’ iPhones. This does make me wonder why power tools, cellos, cars, fighter planes, or anything really can't be controlled by our phones? I guess though, not being able to see the screens in the sun, could be a problem. Let's face it my honeys, the idea is daft. 
 
Dubious idea number 2: weighty sensors in thousands of Copenhagen Wheels, all over Copenhagen (and everywhere else), will create real time maps of the bumpiest roads. More weighty sensors will create real time maps of air quality. So, for carting all of that, um, stuff, in your hub, and uploading it at your expense to the ether, you will help others avoid the bumps and smog that you just rode through. To be honest, I'm not sure why anybody would do that. Look at it in terms of the prisoners dilemma and you will see why it aint gunna work. No one is going is going to fit a 15kg hub to their bike, to benefit others, with little chance of being benefitted personally. Dubious idea number 3: regenerative braking on bicycles. Dubious idea number 4: e-assist hubs. I could go on.

The digital age makes it free to relay hollow prophecies of every kind, so blogs like Coolhunting, and Treehugger, will naturally pick up and publish anything with catchy graphics. When it is issued under the auspices of MIT, you would think those blogs would be on solid ground, but apparently not.

A few weeks ago, I asked SENSEable City Lab if I could meet them to learn more about what they were doing. I did have my doubts, but was open minded. Okay, so next I was put to the trouble of preparing a presentation, that my audience there largely ignored, preferring whatever was on their own laptops. I was left to nag them for a chance to speak to anyone at all regarding what I had gone there to do: learn about their work relating to bikes.

I was given permission to film a clip of the wheel, using my iPhone, that with legalistic overtones they have since told me to pull off of youtube. Which is fair enough I suppose. They can't have known that my opinion of this wheel was slipping from reserved, to qualified, to utterly hopeless.  

Comments

[info]biciclettarob wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2011 05:33 am (UTC)
Are you in Copenhagen yet???
[info]behoovingmoving wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2011 09:56 am (UTC)
soon, roberto, soon. The end of this month, for a week. Harry still there?
[info]lovelybicycle wrote:
Jun. 14th, 2011 07:25 am (UTC)
Interesting to read your thoughts about this. I saw this bike/wheel in action last year. The explanation for how it worked did not make sense to me. I live not far from MIT and wanted to visit the research group, but they were not interested.
[info]lucullus wrote:
Jun. 14th, 2011 08:50 am (UTC)
Did seem over-engineered.
As a way of showing off interesting ideas, it is, ahem, interesting. However, it seems a huge engineering effort for very little actual return. If everyone had one of these tomorrow, it would certainly be a good way to throw away many of the benefits of cycling, without seeing many benefits to replace them ...
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jun. 23rd, 2011 11:47 am (UTC)
Yeah.
Looks like shit, too...
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jun. 28th, 2011 06:57 pm (UTC)
I agree
I've been following this since its inception. Ambiguity is the word I think of with this "MIT" group. First, I doubt it will be able to deliver what they promise. It may get rolling, but distance is equal to the battery's power. To push a 200lb person the miles they claim, can not be done from the size of a battery that will fit in a wheel hub. Unless they've developed kryptonite.

I've felt this was a bogus, attention getting idea that will never come to fruition. If they have a purchase order from a city government, then it's a maybe. It's all PR at this point.
[info]behoovingmoving wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2011 06:38 am (UTC)
Re: I agree
they will say they are exploring ideas for the city 20 years from now, but in the next breath say to place your order now, or come talk turkey about being a distributer. I feel sorry for anyone holding off buying a bike because they have their eye on this hub, or worse still anyone planning to order wholesale.

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow